What do you do when a couple of spammers send almost a million deceptive and spammy emails to your users? You sue them! Under the CAN-SPAM Act, MySpace asked for – and was granted – a massive $230 million in damages from the spammers that were taking advantage of the site’s users and breaking the site’s terms of service by ‘phishing’ and spamming. This case is just the latest in "Spam King" Sanford Wallace’s spammy history. Wallace has been spamming since the early 1990’s, and apparently he just can’t seem to get out of the junk mail business. The MySpace case is just one in a long line of enforcement actions against Wallace’s companies. In 2004, CDT filed a complaint with the FTC, who then brought suit against Wallace in the first major FTC suit in spyware. The MySpace decision is the largest award since the CAN-SPAM Act’s 2003 enactment, though its not likely that the spammers will pay up- they didn’t show up for their court date, and haven’t paid previous fines. We’ve been keeping track of spyware enforcement actions since the beginning of our spyware war; in fact, it has just been updated. In just over three and a half years, we’ve added 25 pages of case summaries. The MySpace judgment won’t be added to the enforcement report- we don’t add cases unless the activity falls within the Anti-Spyware Coalition’s definition of Spyware. Even so, phishing is clearly a related area and it’s great to see that scammers are pursued. Enforcement against spyware is alive and well but so are spyware and other online deceptions. The spyware problem will be around for a long time. Fortunately legislation and other tools have enabled litigation at the federal and state levels, giving enforcement officials solid, workable tools to hit scammers were it hurts most, in their wallets.
Coalition Urges Senate Not to Let Companies Waive Financial Regulations for AI
CDT joined AI Now Institute, American Civil Liberties Union, and several organizations dedicated to tech policy, consumer protection, and civil rights in a letter to Senate leadership and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee opposing the “AI Innovation Labs” language in Sec. 10509 of the CLARITY Act.
Potential Avenues for Redress for AI-related Harms under EU Equality and Non-Discrimination law: A Visual Explanation
In this third instalment of the series, we look at the opportunities afforded by EU equality and non-discrimination law in providing redress for AI-related harms.
CDT and Partners Urge Passage of the California Location Privacy Act of 2025 (AB 322)
Location data is particularly sensitive, and when collected across time it can reveal a broad range of intrusive insights such as medical conditions, sexual orientation, political activities, and religious beliefs.